Skip to main content

The Art of David Lynch




The man who intrigued, inspired and amazed me with his cinematic masterpieces - David Lynch, is the king of film absurdity. Absurdity - a rather not too talked about term in film language is a cult theater specter, bravely taken up by playwrights like Beckett, Genet, Ionesco and several others. As absurd our life is, as absurd our feelings are, as absurd our existence and creation is, the art which is trying to express these feelings will be. A painter turned director, Lynch discovered a space in the film medium in which he could be intuitively absurd and dramatically consistent at the same time. He discovered the sub-conscious cinema. May be it was Bunuel who discovered it, may be Leos Carax puts it more perfectly, but it was Lynch who had the ability to haunt you with his film for your entire life.


Six men getting sick, The Alphabet, The Amputee - these are not the themes of short film anyone would choose who wants to be a director. Neither were his paintings ordinary. 'Box of Bees' depicting a weird shape inside which there is a box is one example. David wanted his painting to move and thus he explored the option of moving pictures. However, the paintings or the short films were always about some deep dark thing inside of us like fear, death or a normal day to day object depicted in such dark shades that one would be scared of it. These expressions, in form of paintings, were mere representation of a man's sub conscious, his perspective which is consistently dark and haunting. It can probably be argued that if he wouldn't have channelized his energy to create things and let go off that emotion, he would have become a sociopath (No disrespect Sir).



His sensitivity to things that looked ugly to many and his constant touch with dreams perhaps helped him to see the sub-conscious, making him able to express beyond the actuality or reality of an object, incident or feeling. The art of of it was known to him and it didn't take much long for Lynch to excel in the craft.

The Art:

Like anything instinctive, a bird's fly or a frogs path from and back to the water, his original films are always circular i.e. it starts where it ends and ends where it starts. Only Earaserhead, Twin Peaks, Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive and Inland Empire are his truly original works in which he didn't adapt from anything. This circular paradigm in a film (when not forcefully or manipulatively done) gives a feeling of completeness in incompleteness and also intrigues for a second watch.

The vibrant use of limited colors is also critical to his films. As a painter, he chooses the color which best communicates the feeling or mystery of the moment and incorporates it in his frames. Grey and yellow, red and blue, black and white are some commonly used and repeated colors in all his films. This specific use of color sets the mood and tone of the scenes perfectly.

Everything is taking place in the sub-conscious. A million times you would have heard that the first part is the dream and last reality and vice versa for some, but neither is true. The entire film is a product of subconscious. Let's take Lost Highway for instance. You can't say that the first part is reality and the later part is a dream. If it is, then how can Fred can listen to his own voice saying "Dick Laurent is dead." In that movie, the tape that Fred and his wife were receiving was also part of the sub-conscious. It was Fred's discovery or frustration of Renee being a porn star and her disloyalty symbolized as an approaching danger through video cassettes. Everything in each of his film is an amalgamation of reality, fantasy and escape.

The drama and expositions are just out of the ordinary. Each intense scene or dialogue is complete on it's own, it can be taken up and hanged in the wall if possible. Club Silencio of Mulholland Drive, Fred and Mystery Man's conversation, Twinkie's ghost scene and many more.

The feeling of something can only be explained with something absurd, not with actual series of events. Which painting is an exact recreation of a real thing? Lynch has excelled in communicating feelings like fear through Club Silencio for example or evil through mystery man or mystery though a chopped off finger or loneliness through the landscapes of Earaserhead.

If I could do anything, I would frame his running film scenes inside a cave and create something quite opposite of an amusement park for people to be alive to feelings like fear and death.

Without you, David Lynch, I would have never loved film making.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The whimsical phrases of 'Capital I'

10 years from now, this film would be remade and probably then the original would be looked upon. There hasn't been a cinematic piece in a long time which was driven solely by such individualistic expression. Be it the philosophical discussion or contemplative imagery, everything screams of the psyche of one individual - 'Capital I'. **Read this after watching the film once** Visually profound and intelligently crafted, at the core of this film you can find an identity and a story embedded in each other. The story of a girl struggling to identify herself with a strict sexual orientation and resorts to 'something' to escape her reality, while a physics professor helps her resolve the conflict in her mind. The identity of a mysterious character named Capital I is presented through its work - visuals and poetry, driven by curiosity among various characters in the film about it. The film portrays the two themes uniquely, bravely. However a harmonic fusion betw

Sheru

'Sheru' is a Hindi word meaning LION in English, this was the closing statement of the film which stayed with me a lot longer than it's running time. An euphoric feeling of finding something special mixed with an attachment to the characters and story, made me write about it. Even though the structure is that of a typical Hollywood narrative - context, conflict, climax, but the film is more about the emotional depths it touches in that structure. The film left three words in my mouth - 'Brilliant Fucking Acting'. - Read this after watching the film once - As exhilarating it was an experience of discovering one's identity, this film, for it's commercial viability, has been biased to portray a one-dimensional story. However, the director leaves a few cues here and there to instill curiosity in the mind of an active watcher for other characters as well. Nicole Kidman playing the role of Sue Brierley narrates a vision of hers in which She sees a brown

Taste of Cherry!

Badii is set out on a journey in a car to find someone to do something. Enough suspense for a film to be interesting, isn't it? ** Spoiler Alert ** No matter how curious the plot makes you, I am sure your own reactions will make you more curious. Undoubtedly, the God of film-making knew the importance of giving space and time to viewers to be judgmental! Badii, while looking for someone, passes through a construction area with laborers around, which makes one think that maybe he is looking for some helping hand for construction. Thoughtfully, no hint is given to you. Then, We see Badii insisting a man who becomes irritated by him giving one a thought that probably he is gay. Beautifully, we see Badii as an outsider like all those people did with whom he had failed endeavors. Like us, they were judgmental about him without even knowing him. It's beautiful to see a man in confusion and trouble, making choices about the person who would bury him. Just like we form groups