Redressing Arrival - The universal language

What language do you think in? Will you be able to change the language of your thought when you learn a new one? Or that inevitably happens?

The question isn't groundbreaking. It must have been asked by many thinkers born after the advent of language. Can thought exist without language? How has it been existing in ancient human? Will it be a picture? What have we lost, if so, in the transition from visual to verbal thoughts?

The ancient of paintings of the world in the Chauvet Cave of France puts enigmatic images of animals on display in a tunnel melting through time.

This could be the most ancient example of psychedelic trance since the information about animal is not supposed to be represented here, rather, a unique disassociation of a one line image in a multitude of others is presented. Imagine this in a cave in a faraway mountain, surrounded only by the wildest of nature, seized by darkness all around, the fire inside the cave lights these images, flickering with the wind and all you could hear is howl and growl.

These images are experiences they were trying to share among themselves. The experiences of things unseen, nature un-encountered and perhaps a spiritual communion of fear, life, death, love, grace and wonder. By sharing my experiences, I trigger your sense of amazement and enable you to experience beyond what I have - with that intention, perhaps, this grand scheme of expression was probably ritualistically followed.

Today, we want to express because we have words, not the other way around.

Now, even after considering the expanse of most sacred form of language and it's purpose, it is still seemingly too far-fetched to think that the comprehension of a language can allow you to move through time - a rather misinterpreted postulate I would say. The Arrival suggests the same, too out-rightly.

I don't feel like going into the film.

Comments

The whimsical phrases of 'Capital I'

10 years from now, this film would be remade and probably then the original would be looked upon. There hasn't been a cinematic piece in a long time which was driven solely by such individualistic expression. Be it the philosophical discussion or contemplative imagery, everything screams of the psyche of one individual - 'Capital I'. **Read this after watching the film once** Visually profound and intelligently crafted, at the core of this film you can find an identity and a story embedded in each other. The story of a girl struggling to identify herself with a strict sexual orientation and resorts to 'something' to escape her reality, while a physics professor helps her resolve the conflict in her mind. The identity of a mysterious character named Capital I is presented through its work - visuals and poetry, driven by curiosity among various characters in the film about it. The film portrays the two themes uniquely, bravely. However a harmonic fusion betw...

Richard Parker - "So many 'Richard Parker' must mean something" - Yann Martel

Yann Martel was quoted saying "So many Richard Parker must mean something". He referred to many fictional and real characters by the name of Richard Parker who were shipwrecked and in most of the cases, resorted to cannibalism. Unlike Poe's, Martel's story instead of being gruesome is rather adventurous; while the context remains the same. Coming to the film, Richard Parker was a hunter whose name interchanged with tiger's due to clerical error. This part of the discussion will tend to represent my perceptions, maybe I am wrong, but please try to feel it with an open mind and consider it. If you think otherwise please let me know. The naming of Pi after a swimming pool is absurd and reflects the absurdity of life. I think, perhaps, Richard Parker was the actual name of Pi. As they were Hindu, it could have been Richard Patel (due to French influence in Pondicherry). In the movie poster also, half faces of both tiger and Pi is shown, probably, to point ou...

The Art of David Lynch

The man who intrigued, inspired and amazed me with his cinematic masterpieces - David Lynch, is the king of film absurdity. Absurdity - a rather not too talked about term in film language is a cult theater specter, bravely taken up by playwrights like Beckett, Genet, Ionesco and several others. As absurd our life is, as absurd our feelings are, as absurd our existence and creation is, the art which is trying to express these feelings will be. A painter turned director, Lynch discovered a space in the film medium in which he could be intuitively absurd and dramatically consistent at the same time. He discovered the sub-conscious cinema. May be it was Bunuel who discovered it, may be Leos Carax puts it more perfectly, but it was Lynch who had the ability to haunt you with his film for your entire life. Six men getting sick, The Alphabet, The Amputee - these are not the themes of short film anyone would choose who wants to be a director. Neither were his paintings ordinary. ...

Films that Matter

Search This Blog