Skip to main content

The Eel - Unagi


Shoehi Imamura amazingly and thoughtfully directed the Eel. It's so beautifully edited and is a minimalist thriller of our time.
There are some really creative and beautiful shots with unique and mature directions. However, the film looses it's spark when it tries to be a little funny and descriptive towards the end.

**Spoiler Alert**

Looking at the film as it proceeds:

1) We cannot make an assumption that he didn't kill his wife at all. It is clear from his surrender and sentence.

2) Letters: A woman's voice was narrating the letters. Why? It can be assumed that he thought of someone who sent (if someone really sent) must be a woman. Also, she mentioned that this is the last time she will warn her. So, why he took actions that day and not before?

3) Sex: The sexual scenes were very passionate/professional. The way it is shown and the expressions of Yamashita suggests that he could never f**k like that (Or maybe he is sterile.)

4) Prison: His behavior (when he is out) depicts he learned to follow orders in prison. What he underwent (from officers and inmates) is never highlighted.

5) Eel: "He doesn't say what I don't wanna hear!" When Yamashita puts the Eel from the bag to a bucket, he actually talks to him and listens to his reply. This shows his belief in the imagination that the eel listens. Though the real question is why eel? And how finally becoming like an eel made him happy and he let go?
Aristole speculated that Eels were born of "earth worms", which he believed were formed of mud, growing from the "guts of wet soil" rather than through sexual reproduction. Does that eel gives him hope maybe cause he is sterile?

P.S. At last he considers the child as his own and is shown happy. This is the only reason i assumed him to be sterile (or not able to make babies).

Conclusion: The reason for why he murdered his wife is only known to him. 8 years of time is long enough to forget the same. In reality also, things like these can never be completely clear and we assume what we are comfortable with.

When he comes back from fishing early, he finds the white sedan and looks at the street light, for a second, it turns red. This symbolizes the fact that he will see reality from 'rose tinted glasses'. He will see what he wants to. And the letters could be a representation of how doubt grows or they could even be real letters.

So, he was living post-prison life accepting that he loved his wife and he couldn't forgive her. He had no place for another women in his life cause he wasn't willing to confront the truth. Until, it was for Keiko (love) he fought with his drunk-sutra reciting-inmate and confronted what he had to say. He excepted the fact that jealousy of being a lousy lover made him do it, not love. The delusional appearance of that man saying that he hallucinated the letters could be either true or false. But now it doesn't bother him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The whimsical phrases of 'Capital I'

10 years from now, this film would be remade and probably then the original would be looked upon. There hasn't been a cinematic piece in a long time which was driven solely by such individualistic expression. Be it the philosophical discussion or contemplative imagery, everything screams of the psyche of one individual - 'Capital I'. **Read this after watching the film once** Visually profound and intelligently crafted, at the core of this film you can find an identity and a story embedded in each other. The story of a girl struggling to identify herself with a strict sexual orientation and resorts to 'something' to escape her reality, while a physics professor helps her resolve the conflict in her mind. The identity of a mysterious character named Capital I is presented through its work - visuals and poetry, driven by curiosity among various characters in the film about it. The film portrays the two themes uniquely, bravely. However a harmonic fusion betw

Sheru

'Sheru' is a Hindi word meaning LION in English, this was the closing statement of the film which stayed with me a lot longer than it's running time. An euphoric feeling of finding something special mixed with an attachment to the characters and story, made me write about it. Even though the structure is that of a typical Hollywood narrative - context, conflict, climax, but the film is more about the emotional depths it touches in that structure. The film left three words in my mouth - 'Brilliant Fucking Acting'. - Read this after watching the film once - As exhilarating it was an experience of discovering one's identity, this film, for it's commercial viability, has been biased to portray a one-dimensional story. However, the director leaves a few cues here and there to instill curiosity in the mind of an active watcher for other characters as well. Nicole Kidman playing the role of Sue Brierley narrates a vision of hers in which She sees a brown

A masterpiece, after a masterpiece, after a masterpiece of execution - Asghar Farhadi

Seldom does a film make you write about it. The occurrence is even slowing with time, however, the edge of the seat situational drama mastered by Asghar Farhadi in his new venture named 'The Salesman' is a light of hope. Who is the author? "Arthur Miller", he says, of a play called the 'Death of a Salesman' that the protagonist, who is also a teacher for young boys (yes, no girls in the class), is going to perform. There is a possible death of a salesman at the end of the film (not in the play), however, this film is about the teacher who plays the salesman. As confusing it may sound, as intricately it has been woven with a packaging of simplicity. There is nothing for you if you haven't watched the film. The characters' psychosis - He is a helpful person, who could risk his life to save someone in need. Hitchcock's ticking time bomb under the table has been realistically executed with a building on the verge of collapsing but in the