Skip to main content

The Eel - Unagi


Shoehi Imamura amazingly and thoughtfully directed the Eel. It's so beautifully edited and is a minimalist thriller of our time.
There are some really creative and beautiful shots with unique and mature directions. However, the film looses it's spark when it tries to be a little funny and descriptive towards the end.

**Spoiler Alert**

Looking at the film as it proceeds:

1) We cannot make an assumption that he didn't kill his wife at all. It is clear from his surrender and sentence.

2) Letters: A woman's voice was narrating the letters. Why? It can be assumed that he thought of someone who sent (if someone really sent) must be a woman. Also, she mentioned that this is the last time she will warn her. So, why he took actions that day and not before?

3) Sex: The sexual scenes were very passionate/professional. The way it is shown and the expressions of Yamashita suggests that he could never f**k like that (Or maybe he is sterile.)

4) Prison: His behavior (when he is out) depicts he learned to follow orders in prison. What he underwent (from officers and inmates) is never highlighted.

5) Eel: "He doesn't say what I don't wanna hear!" When Yamashita puts the Eel from the bag to a bucket, he actually talks to him and listens to his reply. This shows his belief in the imagination that the eel listens. Though the real question is why eel? And how finally becoming like an eel made him happy and he let go?
Aristole speculated that Eels were born of "earth worms", which he believed were formed of mud, growing from the "guts of wet soil" rather than through sexual reproduction. Does that eel gives him hope maybe cause he is sterile?

P.S. At last he considers the child as his own and is shown happy. This is the only reason i assumed him to be sterile (or not able to make babies).

Conclusion: The reason for why he murdered his wife is only known to him. 8 years of time is long enough to forget the same. In reality also, things like these can never be completely clear and we assume what we are comfortable with.

When he comes back from fishing early, he finds the white sedan and looks at the street light, for a second, it turns red. This symbolizes the fact that he will see reality from 'rose tinted glasses'. He will see what he wants to. And the letters could be a representation of how doubt grows or they could even be real letters.

So, he was living post-prison life accepting that he loved his wife and he couldn't forgive her. He had no place for another women in his life cause he wasn't willing to confront the truth. Until, it was for Keiko (love) he fought with his drunk-sutra reciting-inmate and confronted what he had to say. He excepted the fact that jealousy of being a lousy lover made him do it, not love. The delusional appearance of that man saying that he hallucinated the letters could be either true or false. But now it doesn't bother him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The whimsical phrases of 'Capital I'

10 years from now, this film would be remade and probably then the original would be looked upon. There hasn't been a cinematic piece in a long time which was driven solely by such individualistic expression. Be it the philosophical discussion or contemplative imagery, everything screams of the psyche of one individual - 'Capital I'. **Read this after watching the film once** Visually profound and intelligently crafted, at the core of this film you can find an identity and a story embedded in each other. The story of a girl struggling to identify herself with a strict sexual orientation and resorts to 'something' to escape her reality, while a physics professor helps her resolve the conflict in her mind. The identity of a mysterious character named Capital I is presented through its work - visuals and poetry, driven by curiosity among various characters in the film about it. The film portrays the two themes uniquely, bravely. However a harmonic fusion betw...

Richard Parker - "So many 'Richard Parker' must mean something" - Yann Martel

Yann Martel was quoted saying "So many Richard Parker must mean something". He referred to many fictional and real characters by the name of Richard Parker who were shipwrecked and in most of the cases, resorted to cannibalism. Unlike Poe's, Martel's story instead of being gruesome is rather adventurous; while the context remains the same. Coming to the film, Richard Parker was a hunter whose name interchanged with tiger's due to clerical error. This part of the discussion will tend to represent my perceptions, maybe I am wrong, but please try to feel it with an open mind and consider it. If you think otherwise please let me know. The naming of Pi after a swimming pool is absurd and reflects the absurdity of life. I think, perhaps, Richard Parker was the actual name of Pi. As they were Hindu, it could have been Richard Patel (due to French influence in Pondicherry). In the movie poster also, half faces of both tiger and Pi is shown, probably, to point ou...

"Which Story do you Prefer?"

Mychael Danna, beautifully crafted the music of Life of Pi and comes with probably the most soulful theme of the decade - "Which story do you Prefer". As a filmmaker, Ang lee probably made Danna feel every characters and situations and recreate it with music. We all understand that a film couldn't make us feel the temperature of sun, or the moisture at sea, it is just the music which could be close to these feelings. Likewise, in that track, there is a moment of self reflection, and probably a dilemma - Not to Pi, but to all of us who want to find a meaning out of it. As Pi asks towards the end that why you need to find meaning out of it. Because when you do, you will have to stick to your perception about truth. When you try to find meaning, you always keep trying but never get it. Like no one understood the Pi = 3.14159..... cause it's just life, raw life. You don't have to desperately try to give meaning to it. But we do give meaning to our ongoing l...